Showing posts with label users. Show all posts
Showing posts with label users. Show all posts

Friday, March 23, 2012

have transferred database & users from sql 2000 to 2005 but how do i transfer their permissi

We are currently running sql 2000 and are moving our database onto sql 2005 running on a different box.

We have managed to move the entire database, with users however the users permissions on specific tables/views/stored procedures have not been transferred, does anyone know a way of transferring user permissions rather then doing them all by hand?

The system is a large (over 500 table/views/stored procedures) and a very active one and therefore downtime is not optional.

any suggestions would be appreciated

Regards

Chris V

I think you can script those certain objects and execute the script in sql 2005 to create the same as in sql 2000

|||

The users permissions should have been taken across when you moved the databases (did you user a backup/restore method?). However, unless you also moved the master database then these users may well have lost their associated logins. You should be able to fix this by using sp_change_users_login.

However, if the permissions have gone AWOL, i think you will have to just script out the permissions from the old server and apply this script to the new server. I've seen a neat script somewhere using SQLDMO which will do all the permissions in one but alas, i cannot find it right now though i did see this SQL script which should do a similar job albeit on a user by user/role by role basis:-

http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/dba/object_permission_scripts_p1.aspx

A final note, this sort of thing can be avoided by adding all your object level permissions to Roles which are transferred with the database. Users can then just be added to the role again and the problem should be solved.

Anyway, good luck.


HTH!

Have Suggestions for a Front End Tool?

I am currently using Microsoft Excel pivot tables to access data cubes from SQL Server 2002 as a front end tool for users to access sales data. I have run into issues when I am asking the pivot to filter too much. Does anyone have any suggestions on another frontend tool for cubes that does not run into limitations like Excel does? A 3rd party tool? I know Access could be used but I would like to purchase something not write a program?

Thank you,

Carla C. HertelCheck out the following link:

link (http://www.hungrydogsoftware.com/)|||Here is a bigger list:

list (http://www.dwinfocenter.org/olap.html)

But the hungry dog intellibrowser is pretty good.|||Have you checked out Microsoft's pivot table Office Web Component? If you haven't it might be worth a look.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/odeopg/html/deovrworkingwithofficewebcomponents.asp

Good luck|||Panorama Novaview http://www.pansw.com/ OLAP front-end is made by the same company that licensed Microsoft the OLAP server technology for Analysis Services. It has write-back capabilities unlike Bus Obj, Cognos, Crystal et al and some nice features like bubble-up exceptions, wizards for query creation and good thin-client support.

SQLmag published a review of the leading OLAP front-ends for Microsoft Analysis Services:

http://www.sqlmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=26486

There are many tools on the market, but this is the short list.|||i can recommend BusinessObjects - although some dum people (like our MIS dept) use universes only, BusinessObjects can work with MS Analytical Servicers just fine. Business Objects is more reporting tool. They have also special add-in into Excel called BusinessQuery.

microsoft has data analyzer (it's 100% analytical tool) http://www.microsoft.com/office/dataanalyzer/default.asp

jiri|||Hi,

as a client tool we use Q4bisAnalysis.
A quit nice little tool which could be learned within minutes.

More infos:
www.q4bis.com

regards

Michael

Monday, March 19, 2012

Hardware specification query

Hi
I am specifying some hardware for an application server. It will be running
two SQL applications - both applications will have about 20 users.
Throughput will be relatively low with regards to transactions. Both
software vendors would prefer their own server, but I'd rather keep both on
the same box. Both software vendors state specifically that they need a
seperate array for the transaction logs.
I'm thinking of the following:
Dual Xeon (dual core)
7GB RAM (1 GB for OS, 3GB for App1, 3 GB for App2)
RAID1(2 x 74GB15k SCSI) for OS, RAID5(3x146GB 15k SCSI) for App1 database,
RAID5(3x146GB 15k SCSI) for App2 database, RAID1(2x36GB15k SCSI) for App1
transaction logs, RAID1(2x36GB15k SCSI) for App2 transaction logs.
A couple of questions:
Could both transaction logs sit on the same RAID array without any real
decrease in performance?
Would I be better going RAID 10 for the database files as opposed to RAID 5?
Thanks in advance
RobbieRobbie,
From your proposal, it looks like you are blessed with adequate resources.
In fact, for two applications, each with about 20 users, you have proposed
an incredibly 'robust' server.
I'd keep the Logs on separate RAID1 arrays for the optimal performance. If
the db size and storage requirements allow, the databases might be faster
and more 'robust' on the same RAID10 array (instead of separate RAID5
arrays).
--
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Robbie Niblock" <robbie@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OM95gc49GHA.924@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> I am specifying some hardware for an application server. It will be
> running two SQL applications - both applications will have about 20 users.
> Throughput will be relatively low with regards to transactions. Both
> software vendors would prefer their own server, but I'd rather keep both
> on the same box. Both software vendors state specifically that they need a
> seperate array for the transaction logs.
> I'm thinking of the following:
> Dual Xeon (dual core)
> 7GB RAM (1 GB for OS, 3GB for App1, 3 GB for App2)
> RAID1(2 x 74GB15k SCSI) for OS, RAID5(3x146GB 15k SCSI) for App1 database,
> RAID5(3x146GB 15k SCSI) for App2 database, RAID1(2x36GB15k SCSI) for App1
> transaction logs, RAID1(2x36GB15k SCSI) for App2 transaction logs.
> A couple of questions:
> Could both transaction logs sit on the same RAID array without any real
> decrease in performance?
> Would I be better going RAID 10 for the database files as opposed to RAID
> 5?
> Thanks in advance
> Robbie
>

Hardware sizing documentation?

I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on SQL
2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a quad
500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having whats
left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the server
should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I need
different versions of SQL and OS)
thanks
GavGav
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
[url]http://www.sql-server-performance.com/performance_monitor_counters_memory.asp[/url
]
"Gav" <gavin.metcalfe@.nospam.portakabin.com> wrote in message
news:cl80ka$m3s$1@.sparta.btinternet.com...
> I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
> concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on
SQL
> 2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a
quad
> 500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having
whats
> left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the server
> should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
> guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I
need
> different versions of SQL and OS)
> thanks
> Gav
>|||You can also go to HP and IBM websites. They both have sizing tools. You
type in SQL Server, transaction load, write %, size, etc. It recommends a
machine. It's generally pretty accurate, if you're not running anything
wacky.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:uJ#ccP1tEHA.904@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Gav
> http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
>
http://www.sql-server-performance.c...ters_memory.asp">
> "Gav" <gavin.metcalfe@.nospam.portakabin.com> wrote in message
> news:cl80ka$m3s$1@.sparta.btinternet.com...
> SQL
> quad
> whats
server[vbcol=seagreen]
> need
>

Hardware sizing documentation?

I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on SQL
2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a quad
500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having whats
left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the server
should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I need
different versions of SQL and OS)
thanks
Gav
Gav
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
http://www.sql-server-performance.co...ers_memory.asp
"Gav" <gavin.metcalfe@.nospam.portakabin.com> wrote in message
news:cl80ka$m3s$1@.sparta.btinternet.com...
> I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
> concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on
SQL
> 2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a
quad
> 500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having
whats
> left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the server
> should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
> guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I
need
> different versions of SQL and OS)
> thanks
> Gav
>
|||You can also go to HP and IBM websites. They both have sizing tools. You
type in SQL Server, transaction load, write %, size, etc. It recommends a
machine. It's generally pretty accurate, if you're not running anything
wacky.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:uJ#ccP1tEHA.904@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Gav
> http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
>
http://www.sql-server-performance.co...ers_memory.asp[vbcol=seagreen]
> "Gav" <gavin.metcalfe@.nospam.portakabin.com> wrote in message
> news:cl80ka$m3s$1@.sparta.btinternet.com...
> SQL
> quad
> whats
server
> need
>

Hardware sizing documentation?

I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on SQL
2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a quad
500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having whats
left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the server
should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I need
different versions of SQL and OS)
thanks
GavGav
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/performance_monitor_counters_memory.asp
"Gav" <gavin.metcalfe@.nospam.portakabin.com> wrote in message
news:cl80ka$m3s$1@.sparta.btinternet.com...
> I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
> concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on
SQL
> 2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a
quad
> 500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having
whats
> left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the server
> should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
> guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I
need
> different versions of SQL and OS)
> thanks
> Gav
>|||You can also go to HP and IBM websites. They both have sizing tools. You
type in SQL Server, transaction load, write %, size, etc. It recommends a
machine. It's generally pretty accurate, if you're not running anything
wacky.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:uJ#ccP1tEHA.904@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Gav
> http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp
>
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/performance_monitor_counters_memory.asp
> "Gav" <gavin.metcalfe@.nospam.portakabin.com> wrote in message
> news:cl80ka$m3s$1@.sparta.btinternet.com...
> > I am running an SAP system with approximately 250 users (150-170
> > concurrent). The database is currently around 200Gb in size, running on
> SQL
> > 2000 standard edition and Windows 2000 standard server. The server is a
> quad
> > 500Mhz Xeon with 4Gb of ram, 1.7Gb assigned to SQL, SAP and OS having
> whats
> > left. What I am looking for is a rough guide to how much memory the
server
> > should have in relation to the database size. Anybody know of any good
> > guides to sizing the server hardware? (I realise that to use over 2Gb I
> need
> > different versions of SQL and OS)
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Gav
> >
> >
>